← back to Portal
::: NODE SEARCH ::: 22 JUL 2026 :::

Where does Network School
land in Kazakhstan?

[ POST ON X ]
::: THE SITUATION :::

On 21 July 2026 the Iskandar Puteri City Council revoked the business licence of NSO Malaysia Sdn Bhd, the operator of Network School, and ordered its Forest City premises to cease operating from 22 July, citing licensing and premises-use breaches. MDEC moved to revoke the company's Malaysia Digital status, and the Johor state government backed the decision.

Within hours, Balaji Srinivasan announced a memorandum of understanding between the Republic of Kazakhstan and Network School for a new campus, signed with Minister of Digital Development, Innovation and Aerospace Industry Zhaslan Madiyev. The stated terms: expedited visas, streamlined redomiciliation, and active recruitment of talent. The country is decided. The site is not.

THE STRUCTURAL LESSON

Forest City did not fail at the country level. Malaysia welcomed NS. It failed at the facility level: a premises-use licence on two adjoining units, where the activity did not match the permitted use. That is why the gates below are checked at every level. Passing at country level tells you nothing about the building.

::: THE SCOUTING HIERARCHY :::

Country, region, state, facility.

NS scouts in this order. Each level has its own gate, and the level that killed Forest City was the last one.

1Country
Is there a written, named commitment from the sovereign?
Forest City: Malaysia was never the problem. The country welcomed NS.
2Region
Does the region or economic zone have its own legal regime?
Forest City: Johor state ultimately backed the revocation.
3State / city
Is the municipal authority aligned, and who issues the licences?
Forest City: Iskandar Puteri City Council issued the revocation. This was the level that bit.
4Facility
Does this exact building have the correct permitted use on its licence?
Forest City: The fatal detail: units combined into a coworking space where the permitted use did not match.
::: COUNTRY-LEVEL GATES :::

Kazakhstan clears both. Sourced.

PASSGovernment partnership

MOU between the Republic of Kazakhstan and Network School, signed with a named minister (Zhaslan Madiyev, Digital Development, Innovation and Aerospace Industry). Written and named, which is the standard the rubric requires.

Cointelegraph, Kazakhstan deal
PASSImmigration path

Two live instruments: the Neo Nomad visa (B12-1), one year renewable three times for remote workers earning $3,000+/month for a foreign employer; and Digital Nomad Residency (B9-1) for IT professionals with no income floor and a path to 10-year residence.

Fragomen, Kazakhstan digital nomad visa
::: THE RANKING :::

5 candidates, scored.

Each scored 0-5 on nine weighted axes, normalized to 100, then gate-capped. Expand any site for the axis-by-axis breakdown with sources.

#1🇰🇿

Astana (AIFC)

Akmola / capital · State + facility wrapper (AIFC)
88
PLANT THE NODE
PASS GOVT COMMITMENTPASS VISA PATHPASS LEGAL WRAPPER
LANE · Sovereignty & the redomiciliation wrapper

The capital, seat of the sponsoring ministry, and home of the Astana International Financial Centre: English common law, an independent court, and its own financial regulator. It is the single thing NS most lacks right now, codified legal recognition rather than goodwill. Harsh continental winters are the tradeoff.

Axis breakdown + sources
LEGAL WRAPPER · AIFC operates a separate legal regime based on English common law with its own independent court and regulator (AFSA), plus a defined route for foreign companies to redomicile. AIFC, official
5
Government partnership 3.0x
Capital city and seat of the ministry that signed the MOU. Shortest path from campus to sponsor.
Balaji, MOU announcement
5
Immigration & redomiciliation 2.5x
National Neo Nomad / B9-1 instruments apply, and AIFC adds its own entity-migration route on top.
Fragomen
5
Regulatory / crypto 2.0x
AIFC's English-common-law regime with an independent court and the AFSA fintech/crypto framework.
AIFC, official
4
Cost & real estate 1.5x
Cheaper build and lease than any comparable common-law jurisdiction, though pricier than greenfield Kazakhstan. Editorial estimate.
4
Connectivity 1.5x
Astana international airport; fewer direct long-haul routes than Almaty. Editorial estimate.
3
Livability & safety 1.5x
Safe and modern, but one of the coldest capitals on earth. Winter is the binding constraint on the outdoor 'burn'. Editorial estimate.
3
Talent pull 1.0x
Government actively recruiting; smaller organic tech base than Almaty. Editorial estimate.
4
Geopolitical neutrality 1.0x
Kazakhstan runs a multi-vector foreign policy; Russia proximity is the main risk to price in. Editorial estimate.
5
Node specialty fit 1.0x
Owns the lane NS needs most: the legal wrapper. No other node in the network offers common-law redomiciliation.
#2🇰🇿

Alatau City

Almaty region · Region + facility (SEZ, special legal regime)
85
PLANT THE NODE
PASS GOVT COMMITMENTPASS VISA PATHPASS LEGAL WRAPPER
LANE · The purpose-built canvas with a legal wrapper

A new technology city beside Almaty with its own special legal regime, Parliament adopted a 'territory of accelerated development' status, and the SEZ was expanded to roughly 99,000 hectares in late 2025. Its master plan includes a Business Park for IT and a 'Golden District' for education and science. Active territorial development begins 2026, which is both the opportunity and the risk: it is the v4 clone-stamp canvas, but the trunk utilities are still going in.

Axis breakdown + sources
LEGAL WRAPPER · Parliament adopted a special legal regime for Alatau ('territory of accelerated development') with its own economic, administrative and legal rules; the SEZ footprint was expanded and re-zoned in Nov 2025. Novastan, Alatau gains special status
5
Government partnership 3.0x
Special legal regime adopted by Parliament, plus a governance architecture explicitly designed to be predictable for investors from 2026.
Alatau City, 2025 year in review
4
Immigration & redomiciliation 2.5x
National Neo Nomad / B9-1 instruments apply. No Alatau-specific immigration channel confirmed yet, treat as national baseline.
Fragomen
4
Regulatory / crypto 2.0x
SEZ plus accelerated-development legal regime. Not common law like AIFC, so weaker for entity redomiciliation.
Novastan
5
Cost & real estate 1.5x
Greenfield land inside an SEZ with investment incentives, the cheapest credible build in the set.
Invest in Almaty, SEZ
3
Connectivity 1.5x
Almaty international airport is adjacent, but trunk utility networks are only being launched in 2026. Infrastructure risk is real.
Alatau City, 2025 year in review
3
Livability & safety 1.5x
Inherits Almaty's climate and mountains, but as a new-build city the amenity layer is thin today. Editorial estimate.
5
Talent pull 1.0x
Almaty's talent pool is next door, the deepest in the country, and the master plan includes an education and science district.
Alatau City
4
Geopolitical neutrality 1.0x
Same national profile as Astana. Editorial estimate.
5
Node specialty fit 1.0x
The only candidate that is simultaneously a blank canvas AND legally wrapped: the v4 clone-stamp campus with a charter around it.
#3🇰🇿

Almaty (city proper)

Almaty / southeast · State / city, no site-specific wrapper
76
STRONG CANDIDATE
PASS GOVT COMMITMENTPASS VISA PATHFAIL LEGAL WRAPPER
LANE · Livability & talent (the 'burn' node)

The cultural and tech capital: the deepest talent pool, universities, a real startup scene, mountains for the outdoor 'burn', and a milder climate than the north. The catch is structural, redomiciliation runs through AIFC in Astana, and the city proper offers no site-specific legal regime. Best place to live, weakest place to incorporate.

Axis breakdown + sources
LEGAL WRAPPER · No city-specific legal regime. Operates under ordinary Kazakh municipal law, which is precisely the configuration that failed in Iskandar Puteri.
4
Government partnership 3.0x
Covered by the national MOU, but no Almaty-specific written commitment identified. This is the gap to close before committing.
Cointelegraph
3
Immigration & redomiciliation 2.5x
National instruments only.
Fragomen
3
Regulatory / crypto 2.0x
No local crypto or common-law wrapper; AIFC's regime is in Astana. Editorial estimate.
4
Cost & real estate 1.5x
Affordable by OECD standards with real inventory, though the priciest Kazakh city. Editorial estimate.
4
Connectivity 1.5x
The country's largest airport and most international routes. Editorial estimate.
5
Livability & safety 1.5x
Mountains, milder climate, the strongest amenity layer in Kazakhstan. The best 'burn' of any candidate. Editorial estimate.
5
Talent pull 1.0x
Largest concentration of universities, engineers and startups in the country. Editorial estimate.
4
Geopolitical neutrality 1.0x
Same national profile. Editorial estimate.
3
Node specialty fit 1.0x
A great lifestyle node, but it does not own a lane the network lacks. Editorial judgement.
#4🇰🇿

Aktau

Mangystau / Caspian coast · Region (SEZ)
66
STRONG CANDIDATE
PASS GOVT COMMITMENTPASS VISA PATHPASS LEGAL WRAPPER
LANE · Energy & frontier logistics (atoms, not bits)

Caspian port, a special economic zone, energy-adjacent and warmer than the interior. Cheap power for compute and mining plus an aerospace/frontier edge, the sponsoring ministry literally covers aerospace. A distinct atoms-and-energy lane, but a thin talent base and a remote, industrial feel.

Axis breakdown + sources
LEGAL WRAPPER · Operates within a designated special economic zone with its own investment regime, though without a common-law wrapper.
4
Government partnership 3.0x
National MOU plus SEZ administration. No site-specific written commitment identified. Editorial estimate.
3
Immigration & redomiciliation 2.5x
National instruments only. Editorial estimate.
3
Regulatory / crypto 2.0x
SEZ incentives without a common-law regime. Editorial estimate.
4
Cost & real estate 1.5x
Cheap land and power. Editorial estimate.
3
Connectivity 1.5x
Airport and Caspian port, but far fewer international routes. Editorial estimate.
3
Livability & safety 1.5x
Warmer and coastal, but remote and industrial. Editorial estimate.
2
Talent pull 1.0x
Small local technical base. Editorial estimate.
3
Geopolitical neutrality 1.0x
Caspian energy geopolitics add complexity. Editorial estimate.
4
Node specialty fit 1.0x
Owns an energy-and-atoms lane the network genuinely lacks. Editorial judgement.
#5🇰🇿

Karaganda (greenfield)

Karaganda / central · State, greenfield, no wrapper
58
WORKABLE, WITH EFFORT
PASS GOVT COMMITMENTPASS VISA PATHFAIL LEGAL WRAPPER
LANE · The cheapest v4 prefab test bed

Low cost and greenfield land: the cleanest canvas to test the prefab, open-source clone-stamp campus with no legacy constraints. Thin infrastructure and a small talent base make it a lab, not a flagship.

Axis breakdown + sources
LEGAL WRAPPER · No special economic zone or charter regime identified. Ordinary municipal law.
3
Government partnership 3.0x
National MOU only; no regional or municipal commitment identified. Editorial estimate.
3
Immigration & redomiciliation 2.5x
National instruments only. Editorial estimate.
2
Regulatory / crypto 2.0x
No special regime identified. Editorial estimate.
5
Cost & real estate 1.5x
The cheapest land and build cost in the set. Editorial estimate.
2
Connectivity 1.5x
Regional airport, thin international access. Editorial estimate.
3
Livability & safety 1.5x
Continental climate, limited amenity layer. Editorial estimate.
2
Talent pull 1.0x
Small technical base. Editorial estimate.
3
Geopolitical neutrality 1.0x
Same national profile. Editorial estimate.
3
Node specialty fit 1.0x
Useful as a prefab test bed, not as a flagship. Editorial judgement.
THE READ

Astana (AIFC) leads because it answers the exact failure mode: the AIFC gives a codified English-common-law wrapper, an independent court, and a real redomiciliation path, next to the ministry that signed the MOU. Alatau City is the close second and the more interesting bet: a purpose-built tech city that already has its own special legal regime, sitting next to the deepest talent pool in the country.

The honest recommendation is not either/or. Incorporate in Astana under AIFC, put the campus in the Almaty region. Legal wrapper where the law is; people where the people want to be. That split is exactly what Forest City lacked.

::: FACILITY LEVEL ::: ALMATY :::

The level that actually bites.

Four facility options in the Almaty area, each with the specific thing to verify in writing before signing. This is where Forest City was lost.

Alatau City, Business Park / IT district

SEZ greenfield, purpose-built

Inside the special legal regime, zoned for IT and business, with an education and science district in the master plan. The only Almaty-area option where the campus and the legal wrapper are the same jurisdiction.

VERIFY: Trunk utilities only launching in 2026. Confirm power, water and fiber delivery dates in writing before committing a cohort.

Alatau City

Alatau Innovation Technology Park SEZ

Existing SEZ, operating

An operating SEZ the Prime Minister has personally inspected for high-tech manufacturing. Real, occupied infrastructure rather than a rendering.

VERIFY: Zoned around manufacturing. Confirm that a residential-plus-coworking campus is a permitted use, this is exactly the mismatch that revoked Forest City.

PM of Kazakhstan, Alatau ITP SEZ inspection

Almaty central business district

Existing commercial towers

Fastest possible occupancy: fit-out and move in. Maximum amenity, maximum talent proximity, zero construction risk.

VERIFY: No special legal regime, and mixing office with residential/coworking use in a commercial tower is the Forest City failure mode. Verify permitted use per unit, in writing, per floor.

Medeu / Shymbulak mountain corridor

Resort and retreat property

The strongest 'burn' setting in Kazakhstan: altitude, trails, ski access, a genuinely distinctive campus identity.

VERIFY: Seasonal access, limited capacity, and resort zoning that rarely permits long-stay residential-plus-work use.

::: WHAT A NODE IS :::
v1
90-day popup
A startup-society popup. Proof of concept.
v2
Society-as-a-service
A year-long membership program. The current model.
v3
Permanent campus
A purpose-built campus for 1,000+ people.
v4
Clone-stamp template
A prefab, open-source campus blueprint you can stamp anywhere.
v5
Networked archipelago
Alumni spin up their own societies. Network State Plus.
::: SCORE YOUR OWN SITE :::

The rubric, live.

Rate a candidate 0-5 on each axis, or load a site and adjust. Untick a hard gate to watch the score get capped.

0
/ 100 NODE-FIT
HARD GATES · these cap the score, they are not weighted
LOAD A CANDIDATE
1.Government partnership3.0x
2.Immigration & redomiciliation2.5x
3.Regulatory / crypto2.0x
4.Cost & real estate1.5x
5.Connectivity1.5x
6.Livability & safety1.5x
7.Talent pull1.0x
8.Geopolitical neutrality1.0x
9.Node specialty fit1.0x

Weights come from the Malaysia post-mortem: government partnership (3.0x) and immigration (2.5x) outrank cost and lifestyle. The three gates above are not scores. Untick one and the result is capped regardless of everything else, because a licence granted is a licence that can be revoked. Decision support, not an oracle.

::: GUARDRAILS :::
  1. Government partnership is a hard gate, not a score. A site with no written, named commitment is capped below the top tier no matter how cheap or pleasant it is.
  2. Immigration is a hard gate. Model visa status for the actual member-nationality mix, not the average case.
  3. Verify permitted use at the facility level, in writing, per unit. Malaysia was fine. Johor was fine. A premises-use licence on two adjoining units is what actually closed the campus.
  4. Keep 'earned recognition' and 'political goodwill' distinct. Goodwill from a ministry can reverse; codified law is stickier.
  5. Every non-obvious number is either sourced or explicitly labeled an editorial estimate. Do not launder estimates into facts when this reaches decision-makers.
::: WHAT NS ACTUALLY ASKS :::

The form is the rubric.

NS runs a public second-site search with a finder's fee at ns.com/search. What the form asks is what NS weighs. Distilled below, grouped by their own hierarchy.

$100
TOP 1000
$1,000
TOP 100
$10,000
TOP 10
$100,000
FINAL SITE SELECTED

Multiple submissions allowed; judged spam earns nothing.

About you
Sourcing quality, not the site
  • Socials plus at least two links, biggest business run or exited
  • Could you operate or invest in this node yourself?
  • Are you native to the country you are proposing?
Country
Axes 1, 2, 7 · government, immigration, talent
  • Every available digital-nomad visa: name, length in months, income floor, renewability
  • Have you personally applied and gotten one? Exact dates, how long, screenshots
  • The top three champions of tech in the country, with links
  • Can you introduce us to any of them?
City
Axes 5, 6 · connectivity, livability
  • Closest major city and closest international airport, by code
  • Air quality index
Site
Axes 4, 9 and the facility gate
  • Exact address with a maps link, ownership type, your relationship to it
  • Property type, year built, building m², lot m², unit count, bed count, average unit size
  • Zoning: what the property can LEGALLY be used for
  • Inside a special economic zone?
  • Gym? Move-in ready? Rent, sale, or both? Room for expansion nearby?
  • Facilities within a 30 minute drive: grocery, hospital, restaurants, transit, beach, sports, school
  • At least 5 photos, a video walkthrough, wifi speed in Mbps
WHAT THE FORM REVEALS
  1. 01Visas are interrogated hardest: program name, months, income floor, renewability, and proof you personally got one. That confirms immigration as a top-weight axis, and it demands receipts, not vibes.
  2. 02Three named tech champions with warm-intro paths: the government-partnership axis starts as a people problem. A signature begins with someone who can walk you into the room.
  3. 03Zoning is asked as 'what can this property LEGALLY be used for'. That is the exact question Forest City failed. The form learned the same lesson the rubric did.
  4. 04Beds, units, move-in readiness, expansion room: speed to 1,024 residents is a first-class criterion. A gorgeous site that needs two years of construction loses to a move-in-ready one.
  5. 05Air quality index is a named field. Our rubric folded it into livability; NS asks for the number itself.
  6. 06The bounty shape ($100 to $100,000) says NS expects thousands of submissions and needs exactly one to be right. Precision beats volume; a judged-spam submission earns zero.
THE FACILITY CHECKLIST · VERIFY IN WRITING
  • Zoning: the permitted use covers residence plus coworking plus education, per unit, in writing
  • Special economic zone status of the parcel itself, not the district around it
  • Move-in readiness: occupancy possible without construction, or a dated, penalized delivery schedule
  • Capacity: units and beds against the 1,024-resident target, with the expansion parcel identified
  • The burn: gym on site, and outdoor training viable in the local climate most of the year
  • Thirty-minute circle: grocery, hospital, restaurants, transit, and ideally a beach or mountains
  • Wifi speed measured on site in Mbps, plus the airport code and drive time
  • Air quality index for the site, not the country average
::: OTHER SEARCHES :::
::: SOURCES :::

Axis scores are editorial estimates by Interneta from public sources, not an official Network School ranking. Every non-obvious claim carries a source; values without one are labeled editorial estimates in the breakdown.